WHAT'S GOING ON HERE?...

THANKS AMERICAN THINKER....

September 17, 2009

President Jimmy Carter's Cabinet

Lee Cary
Since former President Jimmy Carter has established himself as the arbiter of race-based motives, perhaps we should examine his Cabinet members for racial inclusiveness.

In his four years as President, Carter had 20 Cabinet members: Cyrus Vance; Edmund Muskie; W. Michael Blumenthal; G. William Miller; Harold Brown; Griffin Bell; Benjamin Civiletti; Cecil Andrus; Robert Bergland; Juanita Kreps; Philip Klutznick; Joseph Califano; F. Ray Marshall; Patricia Harris; Shirley Hufsedler; Moon Landrieu; Brock Adams; Neil Goldschmidt; James Schlesinger; and Charles Duncan.

A check of their photographs indicates the following racial/gender distribution:

Whites: 19, of which 18 were males, and 1 female

Blacks (persons-of-color, including African-Americans): 1 African-American female

No African-American male ever served in a Jimmy Carter Cabinet.

How about that.

I CHARGE YOU OF TREASON MR. X PRESIDENT...

YOU SIR... ARE A TROUBLE MAKING PINKO LIKE NO OTHER !I PERSONALLY CHARGE YOU FOR IMPERSONATING AN AMERICAN ... THE ONLY COLOR WE TRUE AMERICANS ARE PREJUDICE AGAINST IS THAT COLOR OF YOU...PINK...MAY GOD HAVE MERCY ON YOUR SOUL.... BECAUSE I WONT!

DOWN THE LAZY RIVER...

I took my doctor[ of fifteen years] fishing on the the Big Horn River here in Montana a couple of weeks ago . While adrift on one of America's top Blue Ribbon Trout rivers, we had this conversation. I asked my Doc..." how long have we known each other now?" He said... "I guess going on fifteen years there about".... then I said "That's about right." So then I said... "Doc, would you consider us to be pretty good friends?... He said..." sure." Then I went on to ask him things, important things, like..." what constitutes solidarity between friends like us, and others as far as that goes?" He answered with this...." Open dialogue, with honesty, and concern for each other, and being there for each other when needed." I find that my doctor, and my very good friend in the same, to be an open, and honest friend that I would take a bullet for if needed. Without any question, I proclaim him to be this kind of friend to me. You see, I tell him everything, that of a patient, or as a friend would divulge depending on the case at the time.

Later on during our excursion, my friend asked me if there was something bothering me. I slowly answer..." Yeah, there are quite a few things bothersome these days, and one in particular is the Health Care Issue, coming down from D.C." From there, I asked the questions bothering me the most, and in particular, regarding the ones talked about while visiting my doctor, and friend, at his office during an examination. Especially the information written down in my records. He inquired more, so I obliged him with my concerns, and cut to the chase. I told my friend,and doctor, that I was very concerned about my records being turned over to the Feds for any reason. I also asked if the things discussed in his office were as confidential as the things discussed on the river. He replied... "most certainly" I said "thank you, and I truly respect that."

I went on to explain to him that I knew all his answers to all my very worrisome questions towards him, but, that I needed to ask them just the same. You see, I was having a hard time getting to my point, and I didn't quite know how. He's my friend, and how do you say to your friend that you might have to sue him if he violates our Doctor-Patient Confidentiality agreement?

I went on with agreement that I know nothing about the law, and he knows me well enough to acknowledge the same regarding his own awkward position on this , as he put it like this... "what are you worried about...and, are we not friends...do we not share things that we wouldn't share with others, including our wives?" My answer was a definite "yes"... and went on to tell him that I would have to sue him , and the clinic he works for, if they turn over my records to the Federal Government. He said "Great! It's about time someone took the bull by the horn, and stood up for their Constitutional Rights regarding this Heath Care BULLSHIT!

I felt like the world had been lifted from my shoulders. To make a longer story shorter, we went on to have a great day on the river, and caught, and released about fifty beautiful Rainbow and Brown Trout that great day on the river, with a friend that I'm proud to call Doc.

Glenn Beck - Current Events & Politics - List of Obama's Czars

Glenn Beck - Current Events & Politics - List of Obama's Czars

U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

Verdict | Victims of Pan Am Flight 103

Verdict | Victims of Pan Am Flight 103: "Home » Government/UN » Documents
Verdict

Court Proceedings - Day 86 January 31, 2001

Proceedings commenced at 11:04 a.m.

THE CLERK: My Lords, have you reached a verdict in respect of each accused on the second alternative charge as now amended?

LORD SUTHERLAND: We have.

THE CLERK: Would you give me, please, your verdict in respect of the first named accused Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi.

LORD SUTHERLAND: Guilty.

THE CLERK: My Lord, is that verdict unanimous or by a majority.

LORD SUTHERLAND: Unanimous.

THE CLERK: Would you give me please your verdict in the name of the second named accused, Al Amin Khalifa Fhimah.

LORD SUTHERLAND: Unanimous.

THE CLERK: Is that, My Lords, unanimous or by a majority.

LORD SUTHERLAND: Unanimous.

THE CLERK: I will now record the verdict, My Lords.

LORD SUTHERLAND: Al Amin Khalifa Fhimah, in view of the verdict of the court, you are now discharged and are free to go.

MR. KEEN: My Lords, in light of the verdict of the court, I would move on behalf of myself, my junior counsel for leave to withdraw.

LORD SUTHERLAND: Certainly, Mr. Keen. Lord Advocate.

THE LORD ADVOCATE: My Lords, I move for sentence. Megrahi is 49 years of age, his date of birth being the 1st of April 1952. So far as is known to the Crown, he is married and has children. A petition warrant was granted for his arrest on the 13th of November 1991. He was delivered to the Netherlands on the 5th of April 1999, when he was arrested on a provisional extradition warrant issued by the Dutch authorities. And having waived his rights to contest extradition, he was arrested by Scottish police officers the same day. He was committed for further examination in custody on the 6th of April 1999. He was fully committed on the 14th of April 1999, and has been in custody since that date.

My Lords, in accordance with normal practice, as he is a non-British citizen he has been served with a notice under Section 62 of the Immigration Act 1971 and it is open to Your Lordships to recommend in terms of Section 3.6 of that Act that he be deported if and when he is released in custody in the future.

My Lords, the names of those who died were read to the court on the 5th of May 2000. In any ordinary case Your Lordships would have heard something of the circumstances of the deceased and the family left behind. In this case it is not possible to do that, and I don't intend to try. I need hardly say to the court that each one left relatives, wives, husbands, parents and children. Something of the scale of the impact can be gleaned from the fact that more than 400 parents lost a son or a daughter, 46 parents lost their only child. 65 women were widowed and 11 men lost their wives. More than 140 lost a parent and 7 children lost both parents. My Lords, they together with the other friends and relatives left behind are also victims of the Lockerbie bombing.

MR. TAYLOR: There are two matters that I should draw to Your Lordships attention. The first is in relation to my client. He maintains his innocence, and therefore there is nothing I can say by way of mitigation. The second is, in relation to the point at which Your Lordships will require to determine the sentence has to run from, and the submission I make to the court is that it should be from the 5th of April 1999. Your Lordships are entitled to make recommendations on how long, given the mandatory nature of the life sentence is concerned, how long the individual should remain in prison prior to release being considered, and I have taken the view that that's a matter within Your Lordships discretion, having heard all of the evidence in the case, and I have no submissions to make on it.

LORD SUTHERLAND: Thank you, Mr. Taylor. We shall take time to consider the matter of a recommendation. The court will adjourn until 2:00, when sentence will be pronounced.

(Proceedings recessed at 11:18 a.m. Proceedings resumed at 2:00 p.m.)

LORD SUTHERLAND: Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi, the mandatory sentence for the crime of murder is imprisonment for life, and that is the sentence we impose. That sentence shall be backdated to the 5th of April 1999. In view of the horrendous nature of this crime, we think it right that we should make a recommendation to the Secretary of State as to the minimum period which you should serve before being considered for release on license, but for the age that you will have attained at the time of your release and the fact that you will be serving this sentence in what is to you a foreign country, the period that we recommend is substantially less than it would otherwise have been. However, we consider that the appropriate recommendation to the Secretary of State is that a period of 20 years should elapse before you are considered for release. You will also be recommended for deportation at the end of the sentence. That is all.

(Proceedings recessed at 2:04 pm.) (excerpted from the court record by Helen Engelhardt)"

Hero's welcome for Lockerbie bomber Megrahi who slaughtered 270 | Mail Online

Hero's welcome for Lockerbie bomber Megrahi who slaughtered 270 | Mail Online

Pelosi_L.pdf - Powered by Google Docs

Pelosi_L.pdf - Powered by Google Docs

Gmail - Jihad Spreading in U.S. Prison System! - inge.robert@gmail.com

Gmail - Jihad Spreading in U.S. Prison System! - inge.robert@gmail.com: "JIHAD COULD
SPREAD IN U.S.
PRISON SYSTEM!
Move America Forward
JIHAD COULD SPREAD IN U.S. PRISON SYSTEM!

SOME SAY “KEEP MILITARY COMISSSIONS” WHILE
DEMOCRATS URGE CIVILIAN COURTS/PRISONS
DESPITE DANGEROUS RISK OF SPREADING JIHAD

Not only is the Obama administration pushing for the closing of Gitmo, but the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee held a two and a half hour meeting this week arguing the merits of Military vs. Civilian justice for those terrorists still held at Guantanamo Bay.

From VOA News:

'Republican members of the committee argued the detainees should be tried in military commissions due to national security concerns. Democratic members of the panel argued that the detainees should be prosecuted in U.S. civilian federal courts, saying military commissions have been discredited in recent years.'

This issue has come to light recently because Obama’s administration is considering whether to RELEASE another GITMO detainee or attempt to keep them detained because of the risk they pose. Because OBAMA decided to try Mohamad Jawad in a civilian federal court, the case against Jawad was DROPPED and that federal court has ORDERED Jawad to be released back to Afghanistan!

But because this detainee is accused of attacking U.S. troops with a grenade, Obama is stuck in a tough situation. Does he abide by the court and possibly release the terrorist? Or keep him detained in the interests of security?

This wouldn’t even be an issue right now if Obama would have continued to prosecute all Gitmo detainees under the system of Military Commissions set up under President Bush.

For the safety of our country, we need your support
so that we can push hard for keeping Gitmo open.

Urge Obama to stop this nonsense!
Make a Donation to KEEP GITMO OPEN.


USE OF CIVILIAN COURTS FOR TERRORISTS
POSES SECURITY / INTELLIGENCE RISKS


The GITMO terrorists don’t deserve the same constitutional rights as American citizens. They get those rights and other special treatment when they are tried in civilian courts like the District Court in Washington that is trying to release this terrorist.

It is clear that SOME members of congress DO indeed understand the importance of Guantanamo Bay and the practice of military commissions. But unfortunately the panel also included members like Dick Durbin who said of our troop’s conduct:


'…you would most certainly believe this must have been done by Nazis, Soviets in their gulags or some mad regime — Pol Pot or others — that had no concern for human beings.' - DICK DURBIN U.S. SENATOR

Don’t let people like Durbin or Obama and his allies in Congress shut down Gitmo and force the American justice department to take on these cases. That would lead to more intelligence gathering failures and fumbling of prosecutions that could lead to harm or even death of American troops or as frightening as it seems, possible attacks here in America.

Make a contribution today for our fund to keep
Gitmo Open by spreading awareness about
how Obama is MISHANDLING the situation!

Watch our TV ad HERE and make a donation
to run it on TV in your local market!



JIHADIST THEORY
WOULD SPREAD
WITHIN THE
U.S. PRISON
SYSTEM

The MANCHESTER MANUAL or
'The Al-Qaeda Handbook'


It has also been described in “The Manchester Manual” otherwise known as The al-Qaeda Handbook, how al Qaeda teaches it’s devotees how to use the prison system to find new recruits and spread the teachings of radical jihad.

Among other things, al Qaeda members are taught…

IF AN INDICTMENT IS ISSUED AND THE TRIAL BEGINS, THE BROTHER HAS TO PAY ATTENTION TO THE FOLLOWING:

1. At the beginning of the trial, once more the brothers must insist on proving that torture was inflicted on them by State Security [investigators] before the judge.

2. Complain [to the court] of mistreatment while in prison.

3. The brother has to do his best to know the names of the state security officers, who participated in his torture and mention their names to the judge. [These names may be obtained from brothers who had to deal with those officers in previous cases.]

4. Take advantage of visits to communicate with brothers outside prison and exchange information that may be helpful to them in their work outside prison [according to what occurred during the investigations]. The importance of mastering the art of hiding messages is self evident here.

5. - The brothers should create an Islamic program for themselves inside the prison, as well as recreational and educational ones, etc.

Source
PBS “Frontline
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/network/alqaeda/manual.html

In the UK, which doesn’t have a separate place for Islamic terrorists, there have already been reports of al-Qaeda recruiting on a massive scale, within the prison system.

AL-QAEDA terrorists have targeted 800 Muslim criminals they want to recruit for their “holy war” against Britain, say prison probation officers.

The officers believe that attempts have been made to convert one in 10 of the estimated 8,000 Muslims in the eight high-security prisons in England and Wales to the Al-Qaeda cause in the past two years.

Source
Times Online 08/28/2008
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article4838032.ece


We MUST keep the terrorists OUTSIDE our civilian prison system, they are only safely held outside the country, in a secure and remote location like Guantanamo Bay.

Please make a donation TODAY to keep GITMO open, our national security and intelligence services depend on it!



Sincerely
Danny Gonzalez
Director of Communications
Move America Forward

Stories We're Tracking
A.P.: U.S. General May Ask for More Troops in Afghanistan
Today on MAF's Blog
MIL Blogger: Pay-Pal SHUTS DOWN Gun-Blogger's Fundraiser FOR THE TROOPS!
Did You Know? MAF is on Your Favorite Social Networks!

Facebook - Hit 'Become a Fan'

Twitter- Hit 'Follow'
Youtube - Hit 'Subscribe

If your e-mail client has trouble displaying this message, or you would like to link to this message on your blog or social network, CLICK HERE for a web-based version.

This email has been sent to: inge.robert@gmail.com
Click Here to Unsubscribe from Mailing List
Reply

Forward




New window
Print all
« Back to Inbox

Archive

Report spam

Delete

Move to


Labels


More actions

‹ Newer 2 of 93 Older ›
Call and instant message your Gmail contacts for free using Google Talk. Learn more
You are currently using 55 MB (0%) of your 7354 MB.
Last account activity: 5 minutes ago on this computer. Details
Gmail view: standard | turn off chat | basic HTML Learn more
©2009 Google - Terms - Privacy Policy - Google Home"

Free Our Health Care Now Online Petition

Free Our Health Care Now Online Petition: "Join the other 940240 people who have signed this petition!"

WND Exclusive MEDIA MATTERS
Realpolitik: Savage on ban list to 'balance' Muslim extremists
'I think we could be accused of duplicity in naming him'
Posted: July 25, 2009
6:35 pm Eastern

© 2009 WorldNetDaily


Michael Savage (San Francisco Chronicle)

Official correspondence, released under the United Kingdom's Freedom of Information law, reveals that U.S. radio talk-show host Michael Savage's name was placed on a list of people banned from Britain in order to provide "balance" to a "least wanted" list dominated by Muslim extremists, and the decision was made "at the highest level of government," the London Daily Mail reported today.

"We will want to ensure that the names disclosed reflect the broad range of cases and are not all Islamic extremists," reads a draft recommendation, marked "Restricted," that was obtained as part of Savage's libel lawsuit against the government and former Home Secretary Jacqui Smith.

Referring to Savage by his birth name, one of the newly released e-mail messages, dated Nov. 27, 2008, from an unnamed Home Office official, says, "with Weiner, I can understand that disclosure of the decision would help provide a balance of types of exclusion cases."

Savage had earlier accused Smith of having plucked his name out of a hat because he was "controversial and white." These latest revelations add weight to Savage's charge.

Savage told WND today the Home Office chose him to balance the list of Muslim extremists because he is Jewish.

"The name Dreyfus comes to mind. They have attempted to destroy my reputation to avoid offending those Muslims who want to destroy them! The Warsaw ghetto comes to mind, where some Jews threw other Jews into gestapo hands to live another day," he said.

Make no mistake about this – they 'chose' me because I am the only talker in the top five who is Jewish! The old anti-Semitic strain has resurfaced in England, not among the right wing, but on the socialist left. This should galvanize every member of the U.S. media, but will it?"

Don't be silent! Sign the petition to block government attacks on freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

Another e-mail, released under FOI, points to complicity by other agencies and even Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

"HO [Home Office] intend to include Weiner in their quarterly stats ... Both the FS [foreign secretary] and PM [prime minister] are firmly behind listing and naming such people," it reads.

The internal e-mail communications include a message from an unnamed civil servant whose cautions were ignored.

"I think we could be accused of duplicity in naming him," he wrote without explaining the reason. But, noting a possible mitigating factor that could quell any controversy, he added, "The fact that he is homophobic does help."

The release of the new information follows an earlier erroneous report that Savage's name was to be removed from the list.

Savage told WND July 18 he was "stunned" by a report in London's Daily Mail saying incoming Home Secretary Alan Johnson scrapped his predecessor's list of people banned from Britain – a list that grouped Savage with Islamic hate preachers and terrorists.

(Story continues below)




Savage had sued outgoing Home Secretary Jacqui Smith for libel for listing him, along with 15 others, as "least wanted" visitors in the country. Meanwhile, Smith's successor, Johnson, called the move a terrible blunder and told the Daily Mail he would scrap the policy of maintaining such enemies lists.

But Savage told WND two days later that according to his attorney, Johnson's announcement did not mean his name had been removed from the list.

"It ain't over till it's over," Savage said on his broadcast that day.

Savage still demands an apology from Smith, who recently admitted she was not up to being home secretary, saying she should have been given some training for the job before being named.

"When I became home secretary I'd never run a major organization," she told Total Politics magazine. "I hope I did a good job but if I did it was more by luck than by any kind of development of skills. I think we should have been better trained. I think there should have been more induction."

Last month, Smith resigned her position in the wake of scandal over personal use of taxpayer funds and her controversial ban of Savage.

Savage took the offensive against her by appearing on a BBC radio program and filing his lawsuit.

Smith contended upon announcing the ban of Savage May 5 that the talk host was "someone who has fallen into the category of fomenting hatred, of such extreme views and expressing them in such a way that it is actually likely to cause inter-community tension or even violence if that person were allowed into the country."

Savage also has sent a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, asking that she call on the British government to withdraw the ban.

The complaint against Smith notes the home secretary's office said in a press release that the "controversial daily radio host" is "considered to be engaging in unacceptable behavior by seeking to provoke others to serious criminal acts and fostering hatred which might lead to inter-community violence."

The allegations are "entirely false," the complaint asserts.

"At no time has our client provoked or sought to provoke others to commit crimes or serious criminal acts."

Savage hosts the nation's third most popular radio talk show, with an estimated 8 million listeners a week on about 400 stations, according to his syndicator, the Talk Radio Network.

Savage told WND after the ban was announced last month that his message for Smith and the people of the U.K. was, "Shame on you. Shame that you've fallen to such a low level."

"It's interesting to me that here I am a talk show host, who does not advocate violence, who advocates patriotic traditional values – borders, language, culture – who is now on a list banned in England," Savage said. "What does that say about the government of England? It says more about them than it says about me."

The U.K. list also includes Hamas leader Yunis Al-Astal, former Ku Klux Klan grand wizard Stephen Donald Black, neo-Nazi Erich Gliebe and radical American pastor Fred Phelps, known for his virulent anti-gay protests at funerals. Phelps' daughter Shirley Phelps-Roper also is on the list.

On his website, Savage appealed to his listeners to contribute to his legal fund, which he has used for various efforts, including a lawsuit last year against the Council on American-Islamic Relations for waging a boycott using excerpts of his copyrighted remarks. In the case of Savage's U.K. ban, however, CAIR has sided with Savage, arguing "freedom of speech is a two-way street."

Bookmark and Share

Double Talk...

Dear Robert:

Thank you for taking the time to contact me about reforming our country's health care system.

I find it very disturbing that 154,000 Montanans currently do not have any health care coverage. I believe that all Americans should have access to affordable health care. Any proposed plan should maintain patient choice, emphasize preventative care, and control costs to consumers and the government.

There are a number of proposals on the table ranging from universal coverage to increasing incentives to provide Americans with private health care coverage. I will look closely at all of them. As issues related to reforming our country's health care system come before the Senate, be assured that I will keep your views in mind.

I appreciate the time that you have taken to be involved and informed about this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me again in the future if I can be of further assistance.

Sincerely,

Jon Tester
United States Senator

BOYCOTT OAKLAWN HILTON...

This Weekend In Chicago: 'Fall of Capitalism, Rise of Islam' Conference [Guy Benson]

This story strikes me as important and quite alarming. Outside of Andy McCarthy's note, there hasn't been very much about it in the local or national media. A friend passes on the link:

A group committed to establishing an international Islamic empire and reportedly linked to Al Qaeda is stepping up its Western recruitment efforts by holding its first official conference in the U.S.

Hizb ut-Tahrir is a global Sunni network with reported ties to confessed 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Al Qaeda in Iraq's onetime leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. It has operated discreetly in the U.S. for decades.

Now, it is coming out of the shadows and openly hosting a July 19 conference entitled, "The Fall of Capitalism and the Rise of Islam," at a posh Hilton hotel in a suburb of Chicago.

Hizb ut-Tahrir insists that it does not engage in terrorism, and it is not recognized by the State Department as a known terror group.

But some terrorism experts say it may be even more dangerous than many groups that are on the terror list.

"Hizb ut-Tahrir is one of the oldest, largest indoctrinating organizations for the ideology known as jihadism," Walid Phares, director of the Future of Terrorism Project at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told FOXNews.com.

Phares said that Hizb ut-Tahrir, rather than training members to carry out terrorist acts like Al Qaeda, focuses instead on indoctrinating youths between ages of 9 and 18 to absorb the ideology that calls for the formation of an empire — or "khilafah" — that will rule according to Islamic law and condones any means to achieve it, including militant jihad.
Hizb ut-Tahrir often says that its indoctrination "prepares the infantry" that groups like Al Qaeda take into battle, Phares said.

"It's like a middle school that prepares them to be recruited by the high school, which is Al Qaeda," he said. "One would compare them to Hitler youth. ... It's an extremely dangerous organization."

Phares said Hizb ut-Tahrir has strongholds in Western countries, including Britain, France and Spain, and clearly is looking to strengthen its base in the U.S.

Nothing to see here, folks ...

07/17 02:23 PMShare

C'MON AMERICANS! WAKE UP!AND DO THE RIGHT THING. HOW ABOUT THAT NATIONAL SECURITY BUNCH, THIS IS WHY THE LIBS SPOKE OUT SO MUCH AGAINIST G.W. BUSH'S PROGRAM, BECAUSE HIS PLAN WORKED, AND WOULD HAVE NEVER ALLOWED THIS DURING HIS WATCH!!!!!!!!!! YOU FUCKING IDIOTS...ONLY IN CHICAGO... WHY?... bp

NOW IS THE TIME TO ACT...

C'mon People! Do you really want to make a difference? Then get off your ass,and make the biggest difference of all! No!... wait a second, hell!... you don't even have to get off your ass to do this. That's right, sit their on your ass and help stomp out Communism right there from your own home! Yeah... imagine that.

How, you may ask. Well it's really quite simple, don't give them your money! Without your money they don't exist!

Who am I talking about... you might ask. Well! there happens to be a long list of companies, and news agencies, products,f.e. N.B.C.,C.B.S.,George Sorros,New York Times,A.B.C.,Washington Post,LA Times,A.C.L.U.,Any General Electric Products,Jeff Imelt! and don't forget, Hollywood! yeah,that's right, they alone, are responsible for most of the Communist activity, and the promotion of Communism, and their attack on the founding Fathers' PRINCIPLES, and IDEOLOGIES, through their movies in this country since the forties.Most of all, make sure you are not spending money donating to Organizations that are out there to fool you, by disguising who they are,and what they represent.ACORN, [AND WHAT EVER THEIR NEW NAME IS TO BE]. A lot of you out there have donated to groups, and fund raisers who's monies have gone towards the advancement of Communism in this Country without knowing it. WARNING! KNOW WHERE YOUR MONEY IS GOING, KNOW WHO YOU ARE SPONSORING, AND, ARE WE SPONSORING THE ADVANCEMENT OF GREEN ENERGY, OR COMMUNISM?

"it's all about Al"

Here we have one of the biggest crooks in the USSA! Not only did he go around the Country during his campaigning for president telling children around Montana and other rural areas of America, that if he won the election that he and his people would send all agriculture productions to 3rd world countries in order to relieve over producing in this country.He was telling this to young Future Farmers, and 4-hrs,who come from family farms and ranches that have been in their families for generations dating back to the 1870's in some cases.

DO YOU HEAR what I'm saying!!!!!Wake the FUCK up!!!

Since then, this fucker has gone around the world making millions and millions [over 100 million] in his pocket targeting the youth of this Country, to brain wash them by telling them shit like "Don't pay any mind to what your parents say, they don't get it any more" All of you out there are responsible for this Bastard getting away with this. He has been doing this since he was vice president, and do I need to count the years for you ... you fucking idiots!

What he is doing,is worse than what Obama is doing... hell , all he's doing is bankrupting them, that fucking Gore is personally Mind Fucking them!!! and getting rich doing it. This should be a Capital Crime!

How long do you think he would have lasted with his plan back pre Revolution days? Turning family against one another. It was the strength of the family, their faith, and love for God that made this The greatest country on earth,and were our freedom and liberties stem from!!!!!I swear to Christ someone needs to stop this shit from ever happening again, and the buck stops here!

All of us need to stop him.To stop him, and others like him, now! All of the physical evidence of what I say is true. So demand action before he has your kids drinking the Kool-Aid too! like the American- Korean sisters doing the time he should be doing!

He is a Liar... a thief...and a PINKO COMMIE...AND NONE OF THIS IS ABOUT GREEN ENERGY!!!! It's about him, and his greed... Hell! he'll probably screw the Party out of their share...He has no scruples,or loyalties to anyone, it's all about Al!

GOD BLESS OUR NAVY SEALS...

God Bless Captain Phillips...God Bless the Navy Seals...God Bless Our Country...God Bless all the Men and Women of our Armed Forces...

GOD DAMN Obama...GOD DAMN Hiliary Clinton...GOD DAMN Rev. Wright... and GOD DAMN the liberal press[NPR,NBC,AP-OBAMA,Moveon.org ect.ect.ect.ect.

HEAR WHAT THEY SAY...

On every question of construction [of the Constitution] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or intended against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed.
— Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), letter to Judge William Johnson, (from Monticello, June 12, 1823)
If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed.
— George Washington, Farewell Address, 1796
Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government.
— James Madison

THE WATERMELON PATCH...

THE GREEN ON THE OUTSIDE and PINK ON THE INSIDE FRUIT...
Feel free to add your favorite melon to the list;

as posted by a great blogger... THE ELEPHANT MAN

Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Insights on Democracy: Davy Crockett

Tonight's insights come from Edward S. Ellis' 1884 entertaining, enlightening, and fascinating biography, "The Life of Colonel David (Davy) Crockett."

The following exert is Chapter XIII in its entirety. It should only take a person 20 minutes, 30 at the most, to read. Trust me it is well worth your time.

I would encourage you to try and get your hands on Ellis' work for Davy Crockett was truly a brilliant man; as honest and patriotic as this country has ever seen.

From time to time, Congress has appropriated money for charitable purposes. The following account of Crockett's experience, while in Washington, is in that line, and is therefore timely and instructive. The narrator says:

"While Crockett was in Congress I had business which required me to spend several weeks in Washington city. Waiting upon one of the departments, or rather one of the chief clerks, for my turn, I had much leisure upon my hands; for, though my business might have been dispatched as well in tow hours as in two months, yet I had to wait. I had made up my mind that I would not leave until my business was settled. My only regular employment was to go every day to the office to learn that it could not be attended to that day.

Crockett was then the lion of Washington. I was a great admirer of his character, and, having several friends who were intimate with him, I found no difficulty in making his acquaintance. I was fascinated with him, and he seemed to take a fancy to me.

I was one day in the lobby of the House of Representatives when a bill was taken up appropriating money for the benefit of a widow of a distinguished naval officer. Several beautiful speeches had been made in its support, rather, as I thought, because it afforded the speakers a fine opportunity for display than from the necessity of convincing anybody, for it seemed to me that everybody favored it. The Speaker was just about to put the question, when Crockett arose. Everybody expected, of course, that he was going to make one of his characteristic speeches in support of the bill. He commenced:

'Mr Speaker - I have as much respect for the memory of the deceased, and as much sympathy for the sufferings of the living, if suffering there be, as any man in this House, but we must not permit our respect for the dead or our sympathy for a part of the living to lead us into an act of injustice to the balance of the living. I will not go into an argument to prove that Congress has no power to appropriate this money as an act of charity. Every member upon this floor knows it. We have the right, as individuals, to give away as much of our own money as we please in charity; but as members of Congress we have no right so to appropriate a dollar of the public money. Some eloquent appeals have been made to us upon the ground that it is a debt due the deceased. Mr. Speaker, the deceased lived long after the close of the war; he was in office to the day of his death, and I have never heard that the Government was in arrears to him. This Government can owe no debts but for services rendered, and at a stipulated price. If it is a debt, how much is it? Has it been audited, and the amount due ascertained? If it is a debt, this is not the place to present it for payment, or to have its merits examined. If it is a debt, we owe more than we can ever hope to pay, for we owe the widow of every soldier who fought in the war of 1812 precisely the same amount. There is a woman in my neighborhood, the widow of as gallant a man as ever shouldered a musket. He fell in battle. She is as good in every respect as this lady, and is as poor. She is earning her daily bread by her daily labor, and if I were to introduce a bill to appropriate five or ten thousand dollars for her benefit, I should be laughed at, and my bill would not get five votes in this House. There are thousands of widows in the country just such as the one I have spoken of; but we never hear of any of these large debts to them. Sir, this is no debt. The Government did not owe it to the deceased when he was alive; it could not contract it after he died. I do not wish to be rude, but I must be plain. Every man in this House knows it is not a debt. We cannot, without the grossest corruption, appropriate this money as the payment of a debt. We have not the semblance of authority to appropriate it as charity. Mr. Speaker, I have said we have the right to give as much money of our own as we please. I am the poorest man on this floor. I cannot vote for this bill, but I will give one week's pay to the object, and if every member of Congress will do the same, it will amount to more than the bill asks.'

He took his seat. Nobody replied. The bill was put upon its passage, and, instead of passing unanimously, as was generally supposed, and as, no doubt, it would, but for that speech, it received but few votes, and, of course, was lost.

Like many other young men, and old ones too, for that matter, who had not thought upon the subject, I desired the passage of the bill, and felt outraged at its defeat. I determined that I would persuade my friend Crockett to move a reconsideration the next day.

Previous engagements preventing me from seeing Crockett that night, I went early to his room the next morning and found him engaged in addressing and franking letters, a large pile of which lay upon his table.

I broke in upon him rather abruptly, by asking him what devil had possessed him to make that speech and defeat that bill yesterday. Without turning his head or looking up from his work, he replied:

'You see that I am very busy now; take a seat and cool yourself. I will be through in a few minutes, and then I will tell you all about it.'

He continued his employment for about ten minutes, and when he had finished it turned to me and said;

'Now, sir, I will answer your question. But thereby hangs a tale, and one of considerable length, to which you will have to listen.'

I listened, and this is the tale which I heard:

'Several years ago I was one evening standing on the steps of the Capitol with some other members of Congress, when our attention was attracted by a great light over in Georgetown. It was evidently a large fire. We jumped into a hack and drove over as fast as we could. When we got there I went to work, and I never worked as hard in my life as I did there for several hours. But, in spite of all that could be done, many houses were burned and many families made houseless, and, besides, some of them had lost all but the clothes they had on. The weather was very cold, and when I saw so many women and children suffering, I felt that something ought to be done for them, and everybody else seemed to feel the same way.

The next morning a bill was introduced appropriating $20,000 for their relief. We put aside all other business, and rushed it through as soon as it could be done. I said everybody felt as I did. That was not quite so; for, though they perhaps sympathized as deeply with the sufferers as I did, there were a few of the members who did not think we had the right to indulge our sympathy or excite our charity at the expense of anybody but ourselves. They opposed the bill, and upon its passage demanded the yeas and nays. There were not enough of them to sustain the call, but many of us wanted our names to appear in favor of what we considered a praiseworthy measure, and we voted with them to sustain it. So the yeas and nays were recorded, and my name appeared on journals in favor of the bill.

The next summer, when it began to be time to think about the election, I concluded that I would take a scout around among the boys of my district. I had no opposition there, but, as the election was some time off, I did not know what might turn up, and I thought it was best to let the boys know that I had not forgot them, and that going to Congress had not made me too proud to go to see them.

So I put a couple of shirts and a few twists of tobacco into my saddle-bags, and put out. I had been out about a week, and had found things going very smoothly, when, riding one day in a part of my district in which I was more of a stranger than any other, I saw a man in a filed plowing and coming toward the road I gauged my gait so that we should meet as he came to the fence. As he came up I spoke to the man. He replied politely, but, as I thought, rather coldly, and was about turning his horse for another furrow, when I asked him if he could give me a chew of tobacco.'

'Yes,' said he, 'such as we make and use in this part of the country; but it may not suit your taste, as you are probably in the habit of using better.'

With that he pulled out of his pocket part of a twist in its natural state, and handed it to me. I took a chew, and handed it back to him. He turned to his plow, and was about to start off. I said to him; 'Don't be in such a hurry, my friend, I want to have a little talk with you, and get better acquainted.' He replied:

'I am very busy, and have but little time to talk, but if it does not take too long, I will listen to what you have to say.'

I began; 'Well, friend, I am one of those unfortunate beings called candidates and __"

'Yes, I know you; you are Colonel Crockett. I have seen you once before, and voted for you the last time you were elected. I suppose you are out electioneering now, but you had better not waste your time or mine. I shall not vote for you again.'

This was a sockdologer. I had been making up my mind that he was one of those churlish fellows who care for nobody but themselves, and take bluntness for independence. I had seen enough of them to know there is a way to reach them, and was satisfied that if I could get him to talk to me I would soon have him straight. But this was entirely a different bundle of sticks. He knew me, had voted for me before, and did not intend to do it again. Something must be the matter; I could not imagine what it was. I had heard of no complaints against me, except that some of the dandies about the village ridiculed some of the wild and foolish things that I too often say and do, and said that I was not enough of a gentleman to go to Congress. I begged him to tell me what was the matter.

'Well, Colonel, it is hardly worth while to waste time or words upon it. I do not see how it can be mended, but you gave a vote last winter which shows that either you have not capacity to understand the Constitution, or that you are wanting in the honesty and firmness to be guided by it. In either case you are not the man to represent me. But I beg your pardon for expressing it in that way. I did not intend to avail myself of the privilege of the constituent to speak plainly to a candidate for the purpose of insulting or wounding you. I intend by it only to say that your understanding of the Constitution is very different from mine; and I will say to you what, but for my rudeness, I should not have said, that I believe you to be honest.'

'Thank you for that, but you find fault with only one vote. You know the story of Henry Clay, the old huntsman and the rifle; you wouldn't break your gun for one snap.'

'No, nor for a dozen. As the story goes, that tack served Mr. Clay's purpose admirably, though it really had nothing to do with the case. I would not break the gun, nor would I discard an honest representative for a mistake in judgment as a mere matter of policy. But an understanding of the Constitution different from mine I cannot overlook, because the Constitution, to be worth anything, must be held sacred, and rigidly observed in all its provisions. The man who wields power and misinterprets it is the more dangerous the more honest he is.'

'I admit the truth of all you say, but there must be some mistake about it, for I do not remember that I gave any vote last winter upon any constitutional question.'

'No, Colonel, there's no mistake. Though I live here in the backwoods and seldom go from home, I take the papers from Washington and read very carefully all the proceedings of Congress. My papers say that last winter you voted for a bill to appropriate $20,000 to some sufferers by a fire in Georgetown. Is that true?'

'Certainly it is, and I thought that was the last vote for which anybody in the world would have found fault with.'

'Well, Colonel, where do you find in the Constitution any authority to give away the public money in charity?'

Here was another sockdologer; for, when I began to think about it, I could not remember a thing in the Constitution that authorized it. I found I must take another tack, so I said:

'Well, my friend; I may as well own up. You have got me there. But certainly nobody will complain that a great and rich country like ours should give the insignificant sum of $20,000 to relieve its suffering women and children, particularly with a full and overflowing Treasury, and I am sure, if you had been there, you would have done just as I did.'

'It is not the amount, Colonel, that I complain of; it is the principle. In the first place, the Government ought to have in the Treasury no more than enough for its legitimate purposes. BU that has nothing to do with the question. The power of collecting and disbursing money at pleasure is the most dangerous power that can be entrusted to man, particularly under our system of collecting revenue by a tariff, which reaches every man in the country, no matter how poor he may be, and the poorer he is the more he pays in proportion to his means. What is worse, it presses upon him without his knowledge where the weight centers, for there is not a man in the United States who can ever guess how much the pays to the Government. So you see, that while you are contributing to relieve one, you are drawing it from thousands who are even worse off than he. If you had the right to give anything, the amount was simply a matter of discretion with you, and you had as much right to give $20,000,000 as $20,000. If you have the right to give to all, and, as the Constitution neither defines charity nor stipulates the amount, you are at liberty to give to any and everything which you may believe, or profess to believe, is a charity, and to any amount you may think proper. You will very easily perceive what a wide door this would open for fraud and corruption and favoritism, on the one hand, and for robbing the people on the other. No, Colonel, Congress has no right to give charity. Individual members may give as much of their own money as they please, but they have no right to touch a dollar of the public money for that purpose. If twice as many houses had been burned in this county as in Georgetown, neither you nor any other member of Congress would have thought of appropriating a dollar for our relief. There are about two hundred and forty members of Congress. If they had shown their sympathy for the sufferers by contributing each one week's pay, it would have made over $13,000. There are plenty of wealthy men in and around Washington who could have given $20,000 without depriving themselves of even a luxury of life. The Congressmen chose to keep their own money, which, if reports be true, some of them spend not very creditably; and the people about Washington, no doubt, applauded you for relieving them from the necessity of giving by giving what was not yours to give. The people have delegated to Congress, by the Constitution, the power to do certain things. To do these, it is authorized to collect and pay moneys, and for nothing else. Everything beyond this is usurpation, and violation of the Constitution.'

'I have given you,' continued Crockett, 'an imperfect account of what he said. Long before he was through, I was convinced that I had done wrong. He wound up by saying:'

'So you see, Colonel, you have violated the Constitution in what I consider a vital point. It is a precedent fraught with danger to the country, for when Congress once begins to stretch its power beyond the limits of the Constitution, there is no limit to it, and no security for the people. I have no doubt you acted honestly, but that does not make it any better, except as far as you are personally concerned, and you see that I cannot vote for you.'

'I tell you I felt streaked. I saw if I should have opposition, and this man should go to talking, he would set others to talking, and in that district I was a gone fawn-skin. I could not answer him, and the fact is I was so fully convinced that he was right, I did not want to. But I must satisfy him, and I said to him:

Well, my friend, you hit the nail upon the head when you said I had not sense enough to understand the Constitution. I intended to be guided by it, and thought I had studied it fully. I have heard many speeches in Congress about the powers of Congress, but what you have said here at your plow has got more hard, sound sense in it, than all the fine speeches I ever heard. If I had ever taken the view of it that you have, I would have put my head into the fire before I would have given that vote, and if you will forgive me and vote for me again, if I ever vote for another unconstitutional law I wish I may be shot.'

He laughingly replied: ' Yes, Colonel, you have sworn to that once before, but I will trust you again upon one condition. You say that you are convinced that your vote was wrong. You acknowledgment of it will do more good than beating you for it. If, as you go round teh district, you will tell the people about this vote, and that you are satisfied it was wrong, I will not only vote for you,k but will do what I can to keep down opposition, and, perhaps, I may exert some little influence in that way.'

'If I don't,' said, I, 'I wish I may be shot; and to convince you that I am in earnest in what I say I will come back this way in a week or ten days, and if you will get up a gathering of the people, I will make a speech to them. Get up a barbecue, and I will pay for it.'

'No, Colonel, we are not rich people in this section, but we have plenty of provisions to contribute for a barbecue, and some to spare for those who have none. The push of crops will be over in a few days, and we can then afford a day for a barbecue. This is Thursday; I will see to getting it up on Saturday week. Come to my house on Friday, and we will go together, and I promise you a very respectable crowd to see and hear you.'

'Well, I will be here. But one thing more before I say good-by. I must known your name.'

'My name is Bunce.'

'Not Horatio Bunce?'

'Yes'

'Well, Mr. Bunce, I never saw you before though you say you have seen me, but I know you very well. I am glad that I have met you, and very proud that I may hope to have you for my friend. You must let me shake your hand before I go.

We shook hands and parted.

It was one of the luckiest hits of my life that I met him. He mingled but little with the public, but was widely known for his remarkable intelligence and incorruptible integrity, and for a heart brimful and running over with kindness and benevolence, which showed themselves not only in words but in acts. He was the oracle of the whole country around him, and his fame had extended far beyond the circle of his immediate acquaintance. Though I had never me him before, I had heard much of him, and but for this meeting it is very likely I should have had opposition, and been beaten. One thing is very certain, no man could now stand up in that district under such a vote.

At the appointed time I was at his house having told our conversation to every crowd I had met, and to every man I stayed all night with, and I found that it gave the people an interest and a confidence in me stronger than I had ever seen manifested before.

Though I was considerably fatigued when I reached his house, and, under ordinary circumstances, should have gone early to bed, I kept him up until midnight, talking about the principles and affairs of government, and got more real, true knowldge of them than I had got all my life before.

It is not exactly pertinent to my story, but I must tell you more about him. When I saw him with his family around him, I was not surprised that he loved to stay at home. I have never in any other family seen a manifestation of so much confidence, familiarity and freedom of manner of children toward their parents mingled with such unbounded love and respect.

He was not at the house when I arrived, but his wife received and welcomed me with all the ease and cordiality of an old friend. She told me that her husband was engaged in some out-door business, but would be in shortly. She is a woman of fin person; her face is not what the world would at first sight esteem as beautiful. In a state of rest there was too much strength and character in it for that, but when she engaged in conversation, and especially when she smiled, it softened into an expression of mingled kindness, goodness, and strength that was beautiful beyond anything I have ever seen.

pretty soon her husband came in, and she left us and went about her household affairs. Toward night the children - he had about seven of them - began to drop in; some from work, some from school, and the little ones from play. They were introduced to me, and met me with the same ease and grace that marked the manner of their mother. Supper came on, and then was exhibited the loveliness of the family circle in all its glow. The father turned the conversation to the matters in which children had been interested during the day, and all, from the oldest to the youngest, took part in it. They spoke to their parents with as much familiarity and confide3nce as if they had been friends of their own age, yet every word and every look manifested as much respect as the humblest courtier could manifest for a king; aye, more, for it was all sincere, and strengthened by love. Verily it was the Happy Family.

I have told you Mr. Bunce converted me politically. He came nearer converting me religiously than I have ever been before. When supper was over, one of the children brought him a Bible and hymn-book. He turned to me and said:

'Colonel, I have for many years been in the habit of family worship night and morning. I adopt this time for it that all may be present. If I postpone it some of us get engaged in one thing and some in another, and the little ones drop off to sleep, so that it is often difficult to get all together.'

'He then opened the bible and read the twenty-third Psalm, commencing: 'The Lord is my Shepherd; I shall not want.' It is a beautiful composition, and his manner of reading it gave it new beauties. We then sang a hymn, and we all knelt down. He commenced his prayer, 'Our Father who art in Heaven.' No one who has not heard him pronounced those words can conceive how they thrilled through me, for I do not believe that they were every pronounced by human lips as by him. I had heard them a thousand times from the lips of preachers of every grade and denomination , and by all sorts of professing Christians, until they had become words of course with me, but his enunciation of them gave them an import and a power of which I had never conceived. There was a grandeur of reverence, a depth of humility, a fullness of confidence and an overflowing of love which told that his spirit was communing face to face with its God. An overwhelming feeling of awe came over me, for I felt that I was in the invisible presence of Jehovah. The whole prayer was grand - grand in its simplicity, in the purity of the spirit it breathed, in its faith, its truth, and its love. I have told you he came nearer converting me religiously than I had ever been before. He did not make a very good Christian of me, as you know; but he has wrought upon my mind a conviction of the truth of Christianity, and upon my feelings a reverence for its purifying and elevating power such as I had never felt before.

I have known and seen much of him since, for I respect him - no, that is not the word - I reverence and love him more than any living man, and I go to see him two or three times every year; and I will tell you, sir, if every one who professes to be a Christian lived and acted and enjoyed it as he does, the religion of Christ would take the world by storm.

But to return to my story. The next morning we went to the barbecue, and, to my surprise, found about a thousand men there. I met a good many whom I had not known before, and they and my friend introduced me around until I had got pretty well acquainted - at least, they all knew me.

In due time notice was given that I would speak to them. They gathered up around a stand that had been erected. I opened my speech by saying:

'Fellow-citizens-I present myself before you to-day feeling like a new man. My eyes have lately been opened to truths which ignorance or prejudice, or both, had heretofore hidden from my view. I feel that I can to-day offer you the ability to render you more valuable service than I have ever been able to render before. I am here today more for the purpose of acknowledging my error than to seek your votes. That I should make this acknowledgment is due to myself as well as to you. Whether you will vote for me is a matter for your consideration only.'

I went on to tell them about the fire and my vote for the appropriating as I have told it to you, and then told them why I was satisfied it was wrong. I closed by saying:

'And now, fellow-citizens, it remains only for me to tell you that the most of the speech you have listened to with so much interest was simply a repetition of the arguments by which your neighbor, Mr. Bunce, convinced me of my error.

It is the best speech I ever made in my life, but he is entitled to the credit of it. And now I hope he is satisfied with his convert and that he will get up here and tell you so.'

'He came upon the stand and said:

'Fellow citizens- It affords me great pleasure to comply with the request of Colonel Crockett. I have always considered him a thoroughly honest man, and I am satisfied that he will faithfully perform all that he has promised you today.'

He went down, and there went up from that crowd such a shout for Davy Crockett as his name never called forth before.

I am not much given to tears, but I was taken with a chocking then and felt some big drops rolling down my cheeks. And I tell you now that the remembrance of those few words spoken by such a man, and the honest, hearty shout they produced is worth more to me than all the honors I have received and all the reputation I have ever made, or ever shall make, as a member of Congress.'

'Now sir,' concluded Crockett, 'you know why I made that speech yesterday. I have had several thousand copies of it printed, and was directing them to my constituents when you came in.

'There is one thing now to which I will call your attention. You remember that I proposed to give a week's pay. There are in that House many very wealthy men-men who think nothing of spending a week's pay, or a dozen of them, for a dinner or a wine party when they have something to accomplish by it. Some of those same men made beautiful speeches upon the great debt of gratitude which the country owed the deceased - a debt which could not be paid by money - and the insignificance and worthlessness of money, particularly so insignificant a sum as $20,000, when weighted against the honor of the nation. Yet not one of them responded to my proposition. Money with them is nothing but trash when it is to come out of the people. But it is the one great thing for which most of them are striving, and many of them sacrifice honor, integrity, and justice to obtain it.'

"The hour for the meeting of the House had by this time arrived. We walked up to the Capitol together, but I said not a word to him about moving a reconsideration. I would as soon have asked a sincere Christian to abjure his religion.'

"I had listened to his story with an interest which was greatly increased by his manner of telling it, for, no matter what we may say of the merits of a story, a speech, or a sermon, it is a very rare production which does not derive its interest more from the manner than the matter, as some of my readers have doubtless, like the writer, proved to their cost.

"By Crockett's aid I succeeded in having my business settled in three or four days afterward, and left Washington. I never saw him again."

----------------------------------------------------------

Man oh man. How I wish we had a couple hundred Davy Crockett's in the House today. Make no mistake, Obama and Pelosi wouldn't stand a chance.
Posted by The Elephant Man at 10:28 PM 0 comments

I'M MAD AS HELL, AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE THIS ANY MORE!!!

I'm mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this any more!
I'm mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this any more!
I'm mad as hell ,and I'm not going to take this any more!
I'm mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this any more!
I'm mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this any more!
I'm mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this any more!
I'm mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this any more!
I'm mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this any more!

TEA PARTY TIME..

TEA PARTY TIME!.. and bring your rope.How much longer are we going to sit back and allow our government continue to make asses out of all of us? Boy! how many times do I, and others need to say...Wake the ---k up America!..Look around and see where we're headed before it's to late!!!! What a mockery of leadership, and representation!

Folks, I can't blame these idiots in office for our mistakes, the people voted them into office in the first place.Take responsibility for your actions and do the right thing. Admit to the mistakes and fix the GD mess!

How many times do we need to be reminded of where we come from, and how we got here? God! I can't believe what the other side is doing to make sure we wont remember... and how they have strategically implemented there plans and diversions to confuse, and spin the truths about their agenda.

I wrote in an earlier article about the importance of stopping,or slowing down long enough to smell the roses, and be able to ask yourself WHY!.. JUST ASK YOURSELF WHY..for example... why is the president still on the campaign trail?... why does the president need to go on the Jay Leno show when the country is going to hell in a hand basket? Why hasn't anyone asked about his plan to form a civilian force up to 125000 people strong during his campaign,and why hasn't there been any talk about it since then?

People, is this administration doing the right thing for the country, or are they working only on strengthening a party? Why, during an economic crisis would they be spending so much time campaigning while spending so much money and creating all the smoke screens to divert our attention?

Why is Washington in a fast forward gear, and what are the main reasons for a hurry-up Congress?What the hell is going on here?Why do we need to rush through all these bills that are only going to bankrupt us now, and future generations to come?People wake up and do the right thing. Just pay attention to what is being said.

Heee...Haaaw, you donkey!

Thank you Mr. president for putting twenty-five fine [I'm sure] new police officers to work in the great town of Columbus Ohio.If this was Hee-Haw I would be one of the characters in the corn field spouting out those very famous words"WE SALUTE YOU".Now all you have to do you ----ing idiot is find work for about 12,ooo,653 more people.

"GOOD-BY PAUL HARVEY... WE"LL MISS YOU"

Thank you Paul Harvey for all of the dedicated years trying... and succeeding if I may add,in making this a better World to live in.I know in my heart God will be honored to have you there.We all know you were a above the rest...as a servant to God and Man. You will be dearly missed,and our thoughts and prayers go out to your family.

COWBOY & COWGIRL UP...

After reading a few blogs today I came to the realization that there are a few of you out there feeling the blues, and are starting to sing a different song than sung before.

Expressing one's views and opinions shouldn't be so difficult if they are heart felt. These are in fact your true beliefs, but yet we all know how hard it can be to express them. To be able take a stand,or to be willing to fight for these beliefs is a show of strength,and maybe you haven't had to take these measures before.

These certainly are excruciating times, and call for equal measures to endure the emotions that come with the territory, therefore, we all need to dig down deep and muster up the strength needed in order to fight the battles ahead.These beliefs come from your convictions, based on all that soul searching that you have done, thus giving you a stance on a solid platform that is only as strong as those beliefs... YOUR FOUNDATION!Stay true to one's self.

While building your foundations you probably noticed changes going on within, some emotional changes, overwhelming sensations of peace and anger.Maybe you didn't know how to manifest these new found feelings and kept them to yourself. Then, you realized there was a strong need to say something, to be heard,so you slowly emerge from your cocoon, that had all of the comforts and securities needed until now. Now you find yourself right dab in the middle of some new found philosophy or ideology that just really feels right, like your favorite pair of boots or hat.

Hey Folks!... this is scary shit! and I know its tough, but we really need to stick together! tightly!!!I'm a big old cowboy from Montana and I'm not afraid of anything,except for having any of my new found brothers and sisters giving up and throwing in the towel. I know that won't happen, because we all believe! So, for all of you crybabies out there who can't seem to get the whole picture, well maybe you need to reevaluate your ideological belief and do some more soul searching, but please don't interfere with what we are doing. Don't take away from our time, while seeking pity for yourselves now that the burden seems a little overwhelming. If you really feel a need to whine, then I suggest you go join up with the GLOBAL WHINERS and stay out of the way of our important agendas.

I thank God everyday that our founding fathers, and mothers, didn't give up... especially so easily. We have a saying here in Montana..."Cowboy Up." I was blessed with five daughters[two by blood and three step]so I say to them, "Cowgirl Up." I really mean Blessed too!

What we are doing, collectively, in this world of blogging is as important as the actions our forefathers took, and for the same reasons whether its going forward with, or reestablishing the same principals they believed in. It's not easy folks, and no one said that it would ever be. Remember, the train that you are getting on, is your train!and you're not alone.Never in the history of this country, was anything ever accomplished [for all the right reasons that is]without a collective effort.

Our efforts that we involve ourselves in, through our little super highways of communication[our pc] certainly give us an unlimited resource advantage over our founding fathers and mothers.With their blood, and our technologies we will prevail again!

We all need to understand the importance of,and the responsibilities involved by taking a stand. We must know where we base them, and what these principals are based on.If you don't know,well maybe you better wait for the next train, or until you know in your heart [100%] that you are ready to lay your life on the line for real CHANGE! Good Luck, and God Bless you all...also...HAPPY BIRTHDAY TESSA... I LOVE YOU!